Maps provide an excellent visual summary of a situation. Maps are useful tools in as much as:
- the value they provide exceeds the cost of their construction and maintenance. Value is reflected in time saved, insights gained and the quality of decisions
- the summary enables a focus on the pertinent issues and not detract from them. A good map enables an immediate view of different levels of details and their relationships
- they enable the situation to be rapidly modelled by users, and users remain cognisant that the map is a representation of the situation, rather than the situation itself
- the map can be easily updated and maintained. The generals have to guide the battle, not become immersed in map maintenance activities
- crowded round the radio in the background, listening to messages and traffic
- had to spend a day painting some new flags for the map or making some more trees
- inadequate maps (long written reports; information scattered between e-mails, written notes or computer files; long lists that are curtailed by the edges of your screen)
- distractions (e-mail; social networking sites)
- huge time costs in maintaining your systems (transferring information between formats, software applications and platforms; report writing)
In the context of this post, it means losing the battle.
No comments:
Post a Comment